Originally published at: Judge Rules First Amendment Doesn’t Apply to the Daily Stormer | Infostormer.com
An Obama appointed federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment doesn’t apply to the Daily Stormer in a recent court ruling.
AP:
In case you are unfamiliar with the back story to this, basically what happened is that this Jewess realtor Tanya Gersh threatened Richard Spencer's mother who owns property in the town of Whitefish, Montana. She was trying to extort her into selling her property over her son's political activities.A federal judge's decision to allow a lawsuit to proceed against the publisher of a neo-Nazi website is "dangerous for free speech," the publisher's attorney said Thursday.
Attorney Marc Randazza said he believes U.S. District Judge Dana Christensen made a legally flawed decision Wednesday in ruling the First Amendment does not shield Daily Stormer publisher Andrew Anglin from being sued for his followers' anti-Semitic harassment of a Jewish woman and her family in Montana.
Randazza said he can "see the allure of not wanting to rule in favor of the Nazi," but expressed concern that the decision could be used to curtail free speech in many other forums.
"The rule needs to be the same no matter what your view is," he said.
Christensen's decision allows Tanya Gersh to proceed with her claims that Anglin invaded her privacy, inflicted emotional distress on her and her family and violated Montana's anti-intimidation law by calling on his followers to unleash a "troll storm" on her, her husband and her 12-year-old son.
From there the Daily Stormer exposed what Gersh was doing, which prompted members of the public to angrily express their displeasure at her behavior. Obviously there’s a bit more to the story, but that’s the basic gist.
The Jewish Southern Poverty Law Center stepped in with legal help which is why there’s this lawsuit against the Daily Stormer going through the court system.
The Jewish media has spun this story as though Gersh is some type of innocent person who did nothing wrong. But the reality is that her threats to Spencer’s mother is what started this whole thing.
This court ruling is absurd. Especially when we see the Jew-run network of CNN suing because they say their First Amendment rights were violated because one of their misbehaving employees got banned from the White House. Not to mention the fact that we don’t see anti-fascists held accountable for doxing and harassing people who have political views they disagree with.
But in those cases the First Amendment applies but in this case it does not? Why is it against the First Amendment to expose a diabolical Jewess engaging in bad behavior?
There’s far too many left-wing judicial activists in the court system and they all need to be purged. They selectively apply Constitutional rights to only those people who they agree with politically.
